|
|
|
|
![[ Articles ]](../images/banner.jpg) |
| Editorial: Always
in motion is the future. |
|
In his conclusion to "The
nexus of fandom and logic" (the findings of his recent
Expanded Universe survey) Mike Cooper asks "are we sick and
tired of the Big Three having to get involved in big galactic wars?"[1]
While this website has previously argued that the future of Star
Wars novels was one without the Skywalkers ("Could
this be the future of Star Wars novels?"), the findings of
Mike's survey suggest that Star Wars book fans are far from being
sick and tired of Luke, Leia and Han leading the story, and they
will be more able to recall key plot elements if the Big Three are
featured in the story.
This article will show, using the data from Mike's survey, that the
answer to his own question is "no we are not" and at the
same time offers a refutation of our argument that the future of
Star Wars novels is one without the Skywalkers. |
 |
|
|
Mike Cooper's recent
survey of 1,500 Star Wars fans via TheForce.Net
and its forums in February was the first real attempt to ascertain
Star Wars books fans' attitudes to key plot events and of the book
itself. The survey required participants to rate "certain
books and comics, as well as certain plot elements, on a 1 to 10
scale"[1].
Although the question order was random, the selection of book and
plot elements were very specific with the vast majority being
paired, for example being asked to rate the Dark Empire comic
trilogy, Luke's fall to the Dark Side and the resurrection of the
Emperor, both of which are key plot points of the Dark Empire
comic trilogy. Mike's conclusion was as he had suspected, that
"we like the books better"[1]
than the plots.
However, there is another element to Mike's conclusion that has
particular relevance to this website, he asks the question
"[are we] sick and tired of the Big Three having to get
involved in big galactic wars?"[1]
In a recent editorial, "Could
this be the future of Star Wars novels?", we argued that
the future of Star Wars books was one without the Skywalkers as they
have featured in almost every Star Wars book published since the
advent of the modern Expanded Universe in 1991 and that the time had
come for Luke and Leia to get some rest after seventeen years of
continuous storytelling. However, it is now our opinion that Mike's
survey offers a No answer to his own question while at the same time
refuting our own argument. The survey results show that Star Wars
book fans need Luke, Leia (and Han) to get involved in big galactic
wars as they are less likely to be interested in stories where
"the Big Three" are not featured and more inclined
not to be conversant with the key plot points of these books.
In his survey Mike also
measured fans familiarity with both key plot elements and their
related book by using fifteen pairings of plot and book (in some
cases even using several plot events from one book such as the Dark
Empire example). If we rank the books by their familiarity score
and list them accordingly, add their year of publication, their
average plot familiarity score and plot familiarity ranking we get: |
 |
Book
familiarity
ranking |
Book title |
Familiarity
score
(%) |
Year(s)
of
publication |
Average plot(s)
familiarity
score (%) |
Plot
familiarity
ranking |
| 1 |
Heir to the Empire Trilogy |
90.7 |
1991-1993 |
85.1 |
4 |
| 2 |
Vector Prime |
89.1 |
1999 |
94 |
1 |
| 3 |
Star By Star |
79.9 |
2002 |
85.4 |
3 |
| 4 |
The Unifying Force |
77.7 |
2003 |
83.1 |
6 |
| 5 |
Betrayal |
77.2 |
2006 |
79.3 |
10 |
| 6 |
Traitor |
76.7 |
2002 |
83.7 |
5 |
| 7 |
Bloodlines |
76.0 |
2006 |
80.2 |
9 |
| 8 |
Dark Empire comic trilogy |
73.9 |
1991-1992 |
90.3 |
2 |
| 9 |
Force Heretic trilogy |
73.4 |
2003 |
82.6 |
7 |
| 10 |
Sacrifice |
73.1 |
2007 |
81.5 |
8 |
| 11 |
Shatterpoint |
70.8 |
2003 |
n/a[2] |
n/a[2] |
| 12 |
Inferno |
70.7 |
2007 |
75.6 |
11 |
| 13 |
Enemy Lines duology |
66.8 |
2002 |
n/a[2] |
n/a[2] |
| 14 |
Darth Bane: Path of
Destruction |
62.9 |
2006 |
69.6 |
12 |
| 15 |
Legacy comic series |
61.0 |
2006-2008 |
63.9 |
13 |
| 16 |
Republic Commando novels |
56.5 |
2004-2007 |
60.3 |
14 |
|
Table 1: Ranking of book
familiarity score[3]
 |
|
It is quite clear that
there is no correlation between a book's publication recency and its
familiarity ranking: it is the oldest published novel surveyed, the Heir
to the Empire trilogy (counted as a single story), that ranks
#1; while, Darth Bane: Path of Destruction, published in
September 2006, ranks #14; and Sacrifice (June 2007) is #10.
Even the two comic series, Dark Empire and Legacy,
exhibit the same difference in familiarity: Dark Empire
(first published 17 years ago) scores 73.9% for book familiarity (#8
ranking); whereas Legacy, one of the most recent comic series
(and still ongoing), is second from bottom (#15 ranking). If we now
compare book familiarity ranking against plot familiarity ranking,
the only visible correlation is that of the bottom third of the
table (highlighted) : i.e. #11 Shatterpoint to #16 the Republic
Commando novels. (It is reasonable to assume that Inferno's
low ranking (#12) is due to its very recent publication, only six
months prior to the survey, and thus not enough readers have had
sufficient time to read the book). So why should these five books be
ranked so low in both book and plot familiarity?
Since both the Heir to the Empire trilogy and Dark Empire
are "[t]he two cornerstones of the moden EU"[1]
and are therefore essential reading for any Star Wars book fan, it
is not surprising to see either placed so high for either book or
plot familiarity (#1 and #5; #8 and #2 respectively). But even when Darth
Bane: Path of Destruction (#14 and #12 for book and plot
familiarity) is compared to a book published in the same year as
itself, either Betrayal or Bloodlines, the other books
are still ranked higher for both familiarity scores (#5 and #10; #7
and #9 respectively). Clearly these five low ranking books must have
something in common that differentiates them from all the other
books.
The answer is simple: none of these five books feature the Big Three
of Luke, Leia and Han: Shatterpoint and the Republic
Commando novels are set before Luke and Leia are born; Darth
Bane: Path of Destruction is set before all three are born; the Legacy
comic series is the story of Luke's descendents after the Big Three
are dead (125 years after Return of the Jedi); and
even the Enemy Lines duology which did have all three in the
second book, only had Luke in the first. However the Star Wars
Expanded Universe isn't just about the further adventures of Luke,
Leia and Han, there are also the adventures of the Prequel Trilogy
characters and of the characters that came before them and before
them and before them. And if we are to enjoy the Expanded Universe
of A Galaxy Far, Far Away we need stories that do not involve the
Big Three. But the survey suggests that a Star
Wars book excluding the Big Three is not going to be overly popular
with Star Wars book fans. This does not
necessarily therefore mean that such books are not commercially
successful. Darth Bane: Path of Destruction achieved #11 in
the New York Times hardback bestseller list[4]
while Republic Commando: True Colors reached #15 in the
paperback chart[5],
a clear indication that exclusion of the Big Three can be popular.
So why have these books still performed so badly in the survey?
It could be, as Mike admits, "the difficulty of accurate
polling"[1]
and the fact that the survey was conducted of 1,500 fans who
answered an article on TheForce.Net and its associated forums must
surely limit the demographic profile of participants. Or it could be
that "everyone wants something different out of their Star
Wars"[1],
that is to say Star Wars fandom is layered: we get out of it what we
want such as political intrigue, romance, lightsaber duels, space
battles, "themes of struggle and redemption"[1]
and so on; and that are more likely to read and enjoy stories that
are reflective of issues that are important to us. However, for
whatever reason, it is clear from even this small polling sample
that Star Wars book fans much prefer stories that include the Big
Three.
As Star Wars book fans
we relish stories that feature our three heroes, not only do more of
us read the books but we are substantially more aware of their plot
points. So what does this mean for the future for Luke, Leia and
Han? Unfortunately, it means that even after seventeen years of
continuous storytelling, we are still not sick of them and they will
have to continue getting involved in big galactic wars for a while
longer because if they are not a part of the story, then we are less
likely to be interested in the story and, which is worse still, we
will be not be as fully conversant with the key plot points! |
|
|
Notes:
- [1] Mike Cooper, The nexus of fandom and
logic, March 2007, StarWars.com
Blogs
- [2] there was no corresponding plot element
pairing for this book
- [3] data used with permission of Mike Cooper
- [4] on 15th October, 2006 (source: New
York Times)
- [5] on 18th November 2007 (source: New
York Times)
|
|
© 2008 swbooks.co.uk. |
|
|
|
|
9 comments |
|
| Mike
Cooper (8th April 2008) |
Great job - this is
exactly the kind of thing I'd hoped people would do.
Obviously the data does suggest that people are more interested in
Luke & Co, but I think there's more going on there than simply
not caring as much about other characters. I believe the fandom
has reached an interesting point in that we really do, I feel,
want the Big Three's story to end because A) they deserve a rest,
as you said, and B) the more time goes by with some huge struggle
happening every five years, the less realistic the whole things
feels.
In fact, I think one major aspect of the Big Three books' higher
interest levels isn't even about caring more for the characters,
but a sort of "what could possibly be happening now??"
feeling...on one hand, we want this universe to seem plausible,
fair, and so on, but at the same time, we can never get enough of
Luke Skywalker. It puts us in a peculiar situation, and that's why
I think we should be asking ourselves what we really want from
Star Wars - sensibility and fairness - where the good guys get to
retire and ride off into the sunset - or a steady supply of guilty
pleasures. The data may point to the latter, but it's my hope that
that can only last so long. I guess we'll see.
|
|
| Seth (11th April 2008) |
I think it would be cool
to let Luke retire from action, but be involved as a Jedi sage who
gives advice to those who sek it. Let Jaina and Ben do the
action. Let Luke be a teacher to whoever wants lessons on
how to be a Jedi that is stronger in the Force. Just some
thoughts from a random fan with an opinion.
|
|
| LL (11th April 2008) |
I think there's more
involved in market appeal than just who the main characters are in
a book. You can use favorite main characters, but if the
plot elements aren't what readers like, you will still shoot
yourself in the foot with a story everyone hates.
The original films had a big survival theme, but they also had a
big enlightenment theme, too. It looks to me (and I allow
that I haven't done a survey!) like the most fervent novel fans
find the survival theme in SW to be by far and away the more
appealing over the deeper, more spiritual themes in the
films. Which is why, if you want to keep these people
buying, there is simply nothing to do but keep Han, Luke, and Leia
off to the wars.
Personally, I think there is a potential audience with the other
side of SW, but these folks aren't going to buy the kind of book
(war, war, war) that's currently being published. These
folks would definitely need the name recognition of a movie
character, however.
But, I haven't done a survey. These are just
up-close-and-personal observations.
|
|
| the
fragrant wookiee (11th April 2008) |
Another possible factor
is that due to the huge amount of Big Three stuff out there, it's
all but impossible not to have their previous adventures
reinforced in your mind.
For instance, I pretty much knew what happened in the Thrawn
trilogy long before I'd read the books themselves due to having
read books set after it and things like the 'Star Wars
Encyclopedia'.
What I'm saying is that familiarity with the lives of Han, Luke
and Leia is built up in successive layers as you read the EU, but
the adventures of, say, the Republic Commandos have had a
relatively small impact on the franchise as a whole.
|
|
| Russ (11th April 2008) |
I think there's a certain
amount of cliffhanger mentality in the current adventures of the
big three. I can't say I've been the most thrilled with the plot
at all times throughout the NJO & Legacy storylines, but I
can't wait to get my hands on the next one just to see what
happens next.
I've personally thought for a long time that there would be an
inevitable day where the story would move on without them. Reading
the X-wing books and being thrilled by those adventures, the Twins
& Anakin growing older and becoming major players in these
events, and even books like the Republic Commando series left me
feeling comfortable with a future without them. Don't get me wrong
though. I still love Luke, Leia, & Han and wish them no harm!!
The prequel era has very few series. Many isolated stories/events
with random characters here and there (an Obi-wan here, Mace Windu
there) There's very little time to become invested in the
characters, where they're going, and how they'll get there. Unlike
in NJO and Legacy where we've literally watched characters grow up
and take their places in the galaxy. The stories may not always be
the best, but I feel that we can't wait to see where it all leads.
|
|
| mj (11th April 2008) |
I disagree. I think
the big galactic conflict, same old, same old, simple story
lines, is exactly what the universe doesn't need and why some fans
are getting tired. How about a more intimate potrayal of
Luke's endeavor to create the new order? Starting with him
perusing countless data about the old Jedi, where they went wrong,
and what changes he needed to make with the new jedi (I.e.
allowing love/marriage, confronting and overcoming the darkside,
more free will, etc). Also, how about an epic, deep plotted
Yoda origin story? The reason Star by Star was so very
successful is that it read like a complex epic novel (EG Dune,
Wheel of Time, etc) and not the simple, rink dink, writing
of most of the EU. I also thought Cloak of Deception was one
of the best "adult" read EU books. Just my 2
cents.
|
|
| ScruffyScoundrelX (11th April
2008) |
I might be deviating from
the focus, but I would love Dark Horse to make more graphic novel
adaptations of these novels being spoken of. They did it
with Thrawn & DarkEmpire, they need to do the NJO and these
brand new ones where Jacin and Mara meet their destinies.
|
|
| Robert D (13th April 2008) |
I think plot and the
ability of the author to tell a story are more important than who
the story is about. I like the big 3, but there have been
times when not all of them were crucial for the plot to work and
it seemed like the author was just putting a chapter in now and
then to keep them handy. (The Joiner Trilogy comes to mind.)
I think one of the reason Darth Bane did well but not great was
simply the fact that it's hard to write a compelling book from an
'evil' point of view. More people enjoy the hero than the
anti-hero.
I agree with Russ in that prequel and sequel series have not had
the chance to really build a following in essence because they
have not had a 'big three' of their own. Many of the books
are here and there. I personally like the Republic Commando
series, because the characters have been given the chance to grow
over the course of there books. I hope to see some
characters come up with a book series of their own set in Old
Republic (KOTOR)or Legacy.
|
|
| Chris J (21st April 2008) |
While they have been
present in some fashion in most of the highly familiar stories, I
would point out that not all of those focused primarily on the big
three. Traitor for example barely a mention of the big three and
focused entirely upon Jacen Solo. Star By Star also featured the
"next generation" cast (i.e. Jacen, Jaina, Tenal Ka, et
cetera) in a major portion of the story. Indeed, with the
exception of Thrawn and Dark Empire, all of the top ten also
featured the "next generation" cast as much, if not more
than the big three.
I think a slightly more accurate way of describing things is that
people are most interested in the continuing saga of Star Wars
(which the ongoing stories of the New Jedi Order and Legacy of the
Force represent) and less so in stories that do not (either by
occuring in the past or by jumping too far into the future in a
medium as relatively small as comics).
I would also point out that familiarity does not necessarily mean
popularity. One can be familiar with Anakin Solo's death in Star
by Star without finding it to be enjoyable or good storytelling.
Indeed, I would suggest that lousy plot developments might even
engender more familiarity than good ones (we tend to remember
things that tick us off) in the long run.
|
|
| George (4th May 2008) |
While the big three still have
some stories to tell, I would love to see more prequel
storylines. I agree Cloak of Deception was the best adult SW
book published along with the Medstar duology. Any featuring
Palpatine/Sidious gets my vote. Finally I always wondered if
the introduction of a gay Jedi would fly with fans.
|
|
| LEAVE A COMMENT: |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
![[ Click here to save up to 50% off Star Wars graphic novels ]](../../images/adverts/banners/728x90/tfaw-04.gif)
|
 |
|
|
|
|